本 Wiki 开启了 HTTPS。但由于同 IP 的 Blog 也开启了 HTTPS，因此本站必须要支持 SNI 的浏览器才能浏览。为了兼容一部分浏览器，本站保留了 HTTP 作为兼容。如果您的浏览器支持 SNI，请尽量通过 HTTPS 访问本站，谢谢！
这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。
| 两侧同时换到之前的修订记录前一修订版后一修订版 | 前一修订版 | ||
| other:jobs:the_prof_in:part_2 [2023/09/14 13:05] – [Where Are the Jobs? Institution Types and Ranks] codinghare | other:jobs:the_prof_in:part_2 [2023/09/16 06:09] (当前版本) – [A Nondefensive Openness to the Exchange of Ideas] codinghare | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 行 331: | 行 331: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| <WRAP center round info 100%> | <WRAP center round info 100%> | ||
| - | R1 与 R2 的主要区别就是 teaching load 的不同。 | + | R1 与 R2 的主要区别就是 teaching load 的不同。\\ \\ |
| + | SLAC 根据 rank 的不同在 teaching load 上有一定差异： | ||
| + | * Mid-Rank 一般与 R2 差不多 | ||
| + | * low-rank 非常高，4/ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | * T4: community collage | ||
| + | * loading 很高，5/ | ||
| + | * 工资与 R2 相当 | ||
| + | ====Where and How to Find Reliable Advice==== | ||
| + | * advisor | ||
| + | * other professor | ||
| + | * academic mentor | ||
| + | * caeer service | ||
| + | * online resources: Chronicle Vitaeand Inside Higher Ed，https:// | ||
| + | ==接下来是他自己的广告== | ||
| + | P99 | ||
| + | ===Why “Yourself” Is the Last Person You Should Be=== | ||
| + | * 不能 “just be yourself”，你需要建立一个专业的人格。这个人格必须是： | ||
| + | * 成熟的成年人 | ||
| + | * 有着非常有组织的研究计划 | ||
| + | * 对某个研究领域做出贡献的自信 | ||
| + | * 拥有路径清晰的发表计划 | ||
| + | * 对思想交流持开放的态度 | ||
| + | * 对部门的真正需求有深刻的理解 | ||
| - | + | ==A Tightly Organized Research Program== | |
| - | + | * 用大约五句话来描述的论文/ | |
| + | * topic | ||
| + | * 相关的data, | ||
| + | * 研究方法（methods） | ||
| + | * 应用方法（approach） | ||
| + | 例子见P107 | ||
| + | ==A Calm Confidence in a Research Contribution to a Field or Discipline.== | ||
| + | * 博士论文 应该是具有开创性的，而不是**仅仅**附加性的： | ||
| + | 反例 | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | 正例 | ||
| + | >In contrast to common views in the field of X, my research shows that instead the core variable is Y. This shifts how we view A and B. | ||
| + | * 博士题目应该是**全新的**（// | ||
| + | ==A Clear and Specific Trajectory of Publications== | ||
| + | * 需要将自己过去，现在，未来的发表串联起来，以计划的形式体现： | ||
| + | 例子： | ||
| + | >//As you saw from my CV, I have two refereed journal articles published on this body of work in the Journal of X and Journal of Y. I have another in revise-and-resubmit stage at the Journal of Z. Beyond that, I am finalizing my book manuscript, and am speaking with editors at Duke and Chicago about a contract. I expect that to be complete in spring of next year, and after that I am planning two more articles based on material that didn’t make it into the book.// | ||
| + | ==Innovative but Concise, Unemotional Plans for Teaching at All Levels of the Curriculum== | ||
| + | * 教学计划需要有新意，但也需要简洁和平稳 | ||
| + | * 使用具体的课程（intro/ | ||
| + | * 内容要包括已经在你教案上的，还有计划开发的 | ||
| + | * 组织上需要介绍： | ||
| + | * 课程名（course titile） | ||
| + | * 课程要点（takeaway points） | ||
| + | * 课程主题 （primary themes） | ||
| + | * tex and readings | ||
| + | * innovative assignment (理想情况下与 digtal resource 和 social media 结合) | ||
| + | * 然后就到此打住，不要说太多。 | ||
| + | ==A Nondefensive Openness to the Exchange of Ideas== | ||
| + | Nondefensive 的例子：\\ \\ | ||
| + | 问题： | ||
| + | >“I notice you don’t really address gender in much detail in the dissertation. Do you have plans to develop that?” | ||
| + | 反例回答： | ||
| + | >Oh my gosh, yes, it’s true. I didn’t really get to include gender. I really wanted to, but, uh, you know, I just ran out of time, and that’s a total lack in the dissertation, | ||
| + | 正例回答（nondefencsive） | ||
| + | >Yes, thanks for raising that point. In fact, as I worked deeper into my analysis I discovered that **gender was not the primary variable**, and that a focus on X allowed me to keep my emphasis on Y.” | ||
| + | 再接： | ||
| + | >and am working up a manuscript that addresses it from the perspective of Z to submit to the Journal of Q. I’d look forward to talking to you more about that. | ||
| + | ==A Steely-Eyed Grasp of the Real (as Opposed to Fantasy) Needs of Actual Hiring Departments== | ||
| + | * dept 要考虑的： | ||
| + | * 招生人数，班级规模，funding，facutly 的生产力，学生的保留率，裁掉垃圾项目等 | ||
| + | * 对招聘人不重要的： | ||
| + | * 你的内心世界（你怎么走到这一步的，你怎么看教学特权，研究荣誉等等） | ||
| + | * 你的研究细节 | ||
| + | * 对他们重要的： | ||
| + | * 能不能快速大量发顶刊 | ||
| + | * 能不能搞到钱 | ||
| + | * 能不能利用新的教学技术，较少的预算来达到较好的教育效果 | ||
| + | * 出色的教学能力 | ||
| + | * teach well enough to avoid lawsuits （应指避免教育能力地下带来的教学事故） | ||
| + | ==如何练习== | ||
| + | * 解答针对的问题 | ||
| + | * 与同行/ | ||